By Lourdes Coss, MPA, NIGP-CPP, CPPO
Public procurement professionals operate at the intersection of governance, finance, and politics. As stewards of public resources, we are entrusted with decisions that must uphold fairness, transparency, and value to the taxpayer. Yet, in politically charged environments—especially during budget cycles or high-visibility projects—procurement integrity is often tested.
In these moments, saying “no” is not a sign of resistance or insubordination. It is a hallmark of professional courage and ethical leadership.
The Hidden Pressures in Public Procurement
Political pressure in procurement can show up in subtle and overt ways:
- A request to “fast-track” a vendor before proper vetting.
- Influence to award to a preferred supplier despite evaluation results.
- Pushback when compliance delays a politically favorable project.
These pressures don’t always come from bad intentions. Elected officials, department heads, or community stakeholders may see procurement as a barrier rather than a strategic partner—especially when they’re under pressure to deliver results. That’s why it’s critical to create a culture and process that resists shortcuts and safeguards trust.
Why Saying “No” Matters
Saying “no” isn’t about confrontation—it’s about protecting the integrity of the process, the confidence of the public, and the credibility of your procurement office.
When we make decisions outside of procurement rules or succumb to influence, we:
- Undermine public trust.
- Risk audit findings and legal consequences.
- Set damaging precedents that weaken the procurement function.
Conversely, when we say “no” with professionalism and clarity, we:
- Reinforce the role of procurement as a neutral, value-driven function.
- Build respect from stakeholders, even if they disagree.
- Create a buffer that allows for better planning, strategy, and results.
How to Say “No” with Authority and Diplomacy
Here are strategies procurement professionals can use to protect integrity without burning bridges:
1. Ground It in Policy and Law
Rather than framing it as a personal stance, refer to the regulatory framework:
“In order to remain in compliance with our procurement code and ensure a fair process, we cannot proceed without a formal solicitation.”
2. Offer Alternatives
Saying “no” doesn’t mean shutting down the conversation. Reframe it:
“We can’t bypass this step, but here’s how we can expedite the timeline within the rules.”
3. Document and Communicate Early
Proactively document decisions and communicate procedures to leadership and stakeholders before issues arise. Clarity prevents misinterpretation later.
4. Build Trust Through Education
Help non-procurement stakeholders understand the “why” behind your decisions. Invite them to trainings or briefings. When people understand the guardrails, they’re less likely to push past them.
5. Support Each Other
Procurement professionals should work together to develop consistent responses, share stories, and offer backup when one team member faces pressure. There is strength in unity.
Creating a Culture That Supports Integrity
Procurement leaders can build resilience by:
- Setting the tone that integrity is non-negotiable.
- Celebrating employees who stand by ethical decisions.
- Including procurement integrity scenarios in team training.
- Establishing escalation procedures that protect staff from undue pressure.
Final Reflection
In a political environment, the temptation to bend the rules or look the other way can be strong. But procurement’s value lies not in saying “yes” to every request—it lies in providing a process that is defensible, equitable, and trusted.
Sometimes the most powerful thing a procurement professional can do for their agency is to say “no”—clearly, respectfully, and with the full weight of their expertise and ethics behind it.
Because when you protect the process, you protect the people it serves.